“One major reason we have the results we see today is that there is no planning,” said Rifka Renee Queruel Nussbaum, syndic of the Tulum City Council. Her remark, made during a recent public appearance, has ignited debate about the internal divisions and lack of coordination within the municipal administration. Queruel, who serves as the municipality’s legal representative, claims she and other council members have been excluded from key decision-making meetings.
The statement comes at a time when Tulum’s tourism sector faces what many officials describe as a “very difficult phase,” one shaped by rapid development, unregulated growth, and political fragmentation. The syndic argues that the current leadership’s opaque decision-making has exacerbated the crisis.
The sidelined voice of the municipality’s legal representative
Queruel’s exclusion from working tables, despite her statutory role, has raised concerns over procedural integrity within Tulum’s city government. “A clear example of this problem is that the syndic is not included in the work sessions, even though she is the municipality’s legal representative,” she said.
According to official records reviewed by The Tulum Times, Queruel has filed multiple requests to be included in planning meetings. None have received formal acknowledgment. For an administration already criticized for disorganization and miscommunication, her absence from key discussions reinforces perceptions of a government operating without coordination or transparency.
Local planning failures echo national scrutiny
Queruel’s comments come amid growing scrutiny from both state and federal figures. Cristina Torres, Quintana Roo’s Secretary of Government, and President Claudia Sheinbaum have also weighed in on governance and tourism access in coastal zones. Their remarks underscore a broader tension between municipal autonomy and federal oversight.
Queruel has aligned herself with these higher-level voices, publicly rejecting a controversial proposal from Mayor Diego Castañón Trejo to regulate public access to beaches through restaurant-controlled entry points. Under his plan, visitors could access the beach only through designated establishments, provided they brought no outside food or beverages.
“The law is clear: beaches are free and with absolute freedom,” Queruel declared when questioned about the plan. Her stance mirrors national legal frameworks protecting Mexico’s coastlines as public domains.
A fragile balance between development and governance
At the heart of the conflict lies a fundamental question: who controls Tulum’s future? Once a quiet coastal village, the town has become a symbol of both opportunity and chaos. The rapid influx of tourists and investors has produced record construction, strained infrastructure, and mounting social tension.
Critics say these issues stem from a lack of comprehensive urban planning. While state and federal authorities promote development aligned with sustainability and inclusivity, local governance often appears reactive, shaped more by political interest than by long-term strategy. Queruel’s exclusion, many argue, is emblematic of a government unwilling to tolerate dissenting voices.
When local politics meets national ambition
The dispute also reflects shifting political alliances in Quintana Roo, where the rise of President Sheinbaum’s administration has altered the balance of influence. As federal authorities push for accountability in tourism development and environmental protection, municipalities like Tulum face increasing pressure to align with national policies.
Queruel’s stance, though local in scope, places her within a broader network of officials calling for institutional transparency and respect for legal norms. By challenging Mayor Castañón’s leadership, she is not only asserting her role but also testing the boundaries of political independence within Morena’s regional hierarchy.
A senior political observer in Chetumal told The Tulum Times that Tulum’s government “has become a laboratory of power struggles, between institutional continuity and the urgency to reset how the town is governed.”
Public access and political optics
The beach access controversy, while seemingly symbolic, has become a touchstone for public opinion. In a town where tourism is the economic lifeblood, the idea of limiting access, even indirectly, has sparked strong reactions. For Queruel and her supporters, defending public rights is a way to reframe Tulum’s image as inclusive and lawful.
But others within the administration view her actions as political theater. Some officials argue that her criticism, though legitimate, undermines collective credibility. Still, public sentiment appears to lean toward transparency, especially after months of visible strain between municipal offices and the tourism sector.
Tourism decline sharpens calls for accountability
Tourism in the Riviera Maya has shown signs of slowdown, with local business leaders citing safety concerns, infrastructure deficiencies, and inconsistent policy enforcement. Queruel’s statement that Tulum is going through a “very difficult stage in tourism” echoes what hotel associations and transport cooperatives have been warning for months.
Without cohesive planning, experts say, Tulum risks losing its competitive edge to nearby destinations such as Playa del Carmen and Bacalar. “Planning isn’t bureaucracy,” a local entrepreneur told The Tulum Times. “It’s the difference between sustainable growth and chaos.”
Political silence from the mayor’s office
Mayor Diego Castañón Trejo has not publicly responded to Queruel’s latest remarks. However, his administration has previously defended its management style, emphasizing that decisions are made “in alignment with the municipality’s operational priorities.”
Yet the absence of the syndic from those discussions continues to raise questions. In municipal law, the syndic’s role includes ensuring legality and protecting the city’s interests in contracts, litigation, and policy reforms. Her exclusion therefore carries not only political but also institutional implications.
The stakes for Tulum’s credibility
As Tulum navigates its next phase of growth, the credibility of its government may depend on whether it can demonstrate unity and transparency. Queruel’s challenge exposes an uncomfortable truth: beneath the image of paradise lies a governance model struggling to adapt to its own success.
What began as a disagreement over meeting invitations now touches the very definition of authority in one of Mexico’s fastest-growing municipalities. For residents and investors alike, the outcome could shape the town’s trajectory for years.
In the words of a local civic leader, “If planning fails, politics fills the void.”
The uncertain road ahead
Whether Queruel’s push for inclusion will change the administration’s approach remains unclear. But her stance has already reshaped the conversation about accountability and the balance of power in Tulum. With national figures echoing similar concerns, the town’s internal disputes may soon draw wider attention across Quintana Roo, and beyond.
As Tulum prepares for another tourism season under scrutiny, its leaders face a critical test: can they govern together, or will division become policy by default?
The coming months may answer that question.
Tulum’s future, it seems, will depend as much on political will as on planning itself.
We’d love to hear your thoughts. Join the conversation on The Tulum Times’ social media.
Do you think Tulum’s political divisions are undermining its ability to plan sustainably?