The Tulum Archaeological Site received 1,031,443 visitors in 2025, marking a 20 percent decline compared with the previous year and the steepest drop recorded in the past decade, according to official figures.

Data released by the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia shows the site welcomed roughly 213,000 fewer visitors than in 2024, when attendance reached about 1.24 million. Excluding the pandemic years of 2020 and 2021, the 2025 total is the lowest since 2010, when just under one million visits were recorded.

The downturn appears to reflect a year marked by controversy around access, management, and rising fees at one of Mexico’s most recognizable cultural landmarks.

Controversies weighed on visitor confidence

Throughout 2025, employees of the INAH staged protests alleging a usurpation of functions by the Grupo Aeroportuario Ferroviario de Servicios Auxiliares y Conexos Olmeca-Maya-Mexica, known as GAFSACOMM. The state-run entity, administered by Mexico’s armed forces, assumed control of charging admission to the Parque Nacional Tulum, which encompasses access routes to the archaeological zone and surrounding natural areas.

The protests were followed by citizen demonstrations objecting to fees imposed by military personnel to enter the park and nearby beaches. Images and reports circulating during the year contributed to a perception of restricted access and higher costs, elements that tourism analysts say can influence travel decisions even among established destinations.

By the end of the year, official statistics confirmed that the prolonged disputes coincided with a sharp contraction in foot traffic.

Entrance fees doubled for 2026

Prospects for a near-term recovery remain uncertain. For the current year, the admission fee to the Tulum Archaeological Site has doubled from 100 to 206 pesos. Similar increases have been applied across other archaeological sites in Quintana Roo operated by the INAH.

The higher costs add to a broader debate over affordability and management of cultural heritage sites, particularly in destinations that rely heavily on international tourism. While authorities have argued that the fees support conservation and maintenance, critics say the sudden increases risk discouraging visitors already sensitive to price and access conditions.

Statewide numbers mirror the decline

The trend extends beyond Tulum. In 2025, the 12 archaeological sites across Quintana Roo received a combined 1.6 million visitors, also the lowest figure since 2010. That year likewise registered 1.6 million entries statewide.

Compared with 2018, when the Tulum ruins alone attracted 2.1 million visitors and the state’s archaeological sites totaled 3.4 million, the scale of the contraction is pronounced. Seven years later, Tulum is receiving less than half the visitors it did at its peak, and the statewide total has fallen by a similar proportion.

The data suggests that the setbacks of 2025 effectively rolled back archaeological tourism in the region by roughly 15 years in terms of visitor volume.

National ranking remains unchanged

Despite the decline, Tulum maintained its position as Mexico’s third most visited archaeological site in 2025. Only Chichén Itzá, with 2.2 million visitors, and Teotihuacán, with 1.8 million, recorded higher attendance.

Within Quintana Roo, other frequently visited sites included Chacchoben with 237,039 visitors, Cobá with 191,815, and San Gervasio with 143,541. None, however, offset the steep fall registered at the state’s flagship site.

Long-term growth interrupted

From 2011 onward, the Tulum Archaeological Site consistently surpassed one million annual visitors, reaching its historic high in 2018. Against that benchmark, the 2025 figure represents a 52 percent drop, or roughly 1.1 million fewer visitors.

A subtle but notable aspect of the data is how closely the site’s trajectory mirrors the broader statewide pattern. The near-parallel declines suggest that the issues affecting Tulum may have influenced perceptions of archaeological tourism across Quintana Roo more generally, rather than remaining isolated to a single location.

For The Tulum Times, the figures underscore what is at stake as authorities balance conservation, management changes, and public access at heritage sites that anchor the region’s cultural identity and tourism economy. Whether visitor confidence can be restored amid higher fees and lingering disputes will shape the future of the Tulum archaeological site.

We’d love to hear your thoughts. Join the conversation on The Tulum Times’ social media.
What measures do you think would help restore visitor confidence at the Tulum archaeological site?